Try to find the Light

Maret 18, 2007

Remembering Muhammad al-Durra

Remembering Muhammad al-Durra
Source: Palestine Chronicle

durra_929.jpg 

Two men shot Muhammad Al-Durra five years ago this week, on Sept 30, 2000, two days after the outbreak of Intifada II: The occupation soldier who shot the fatal bullet that killed him, and the photo journalist who shot the iconic picture that immortalized him. Muhammad, of course, was the 12-year old boy killed in the arms of his father, who had vainly tried to shield him from harm as both crouched, compressed and trapped, between a low wall and a large metal barrel at the Netzarin Junction.

The harrowing image, filmed by Palestinian cameraman Talal Abu Rahma for France 2 television, carries the emblematic power of a battle flag. Its heart-rending intensity, its fevered veracity, puts it beyond all rational understanding. It is a lasting image of the war against the Palestinian people and how Israel has conducted it.

Hundreds of poems have been written about the boy. Several countries, including Egypt, Tunisia and Belgium, have issued stamps commemorating the event. Parks and streets (including one in Cairo, where, tellingly, the Israeli Embassy is located) have been named in his honor.

Yes, that image has encoded its dark derangement in our consciousness, attesting to how a picture, clichés aside, is worth a thousand words, how we live in a world today where a verbal matrix is not the only one in which the articulation and conduct of the mind’s eye are conceivable.

For in its gruesome starkness, its distinctive dread, that video (and choose here whatever frame you want) jettisons all of the Palestinian conflict’s subplots — checkpoints, collective punishment, targeted assassinations, land grabs, home demolitions — and leaves it bare for us all to see.

Blow up one of these frames, or put it under a magnifying glass, as I have done, and what strikes you most of all is the blood pooling under the boy’s legs, an image more chilling than the depiction of any war scene.

The death of Muhammad was the picture seen around the world because photographs transcend language barriers and are relentlessly direct in the message they strive to convey.

“Ever since cameras were invented in 1839,” wrote the late literary critic Susan Sontag in “Regarding the Pain of Others,” a follow-up to “On Photography,” her earlier book on the subject, “photography has kept company with death.”

You stop in your tracks here, till you read on: “Once the camera was emancipated from the tripod, truly portable, and equipped with a range finder and a variety of lenses that permitted unprecedented feats of close observation from a distant vantage point, picture-taking acquired an immediacy and authority greater than any verbal account in conveying the horror of mass-produced death.”

Not satisfied with the dictum that a picture is worth a thousand words, Israeli officials and their apologists in the US and elsewhere have turned it upside down to read that a picture is worth a thousand arguments — namely that the boy died in the crossfire at the hands of Palestinian militants, not Israeli soldiers. Humbug!

Since the Intifada started, and since that provocative walkabout by Ariel Sharon on the grounds of the Al-Aqsa Mosque that triggered it, five years ago today, the Palestinians — left unable to choose how they lived, only how they died — turned from stone-throwing to suicide-bombing, and the Israelis turned from machine guns to tanks and Apache helicopters.

According to the latest figures put out by the United Nations Children’s agency, UNICEF, 542 Palestinian children have been killed over the last five years. Children under occupation continue to live mutilated lives, many of them, according to the UN agency, “suffering emotional problems,” like speech impediments, bedwetting, crying, panic attacks and temper tantrums, symptoms that manifest themselves in adult life as aggressive behavior.

That picture of 12-year old Muhammad Al-Durra embodies that human devastation. It joins that pantheon of iconic pictures from around the world — the horrific image of the execution of a Vietcong prisoner in a Saigon street by a Vietnamese police officer in 1968; John Filo’s shot of a girl wailing over the body of a slain Kent State student in 1970; that shot from Vietnam in 1972 of a little girl running — naked and screaming — from a napalm bombing toward the lens of Nick Ut’s camera; and most recently, a hooded Iraqi prisoner standing on a box with wires connected to his hands.

All these pictures, like that depicting the death of Muhammad, are not just iconic, but impactful as well, in the way they both represent a radical transformation of how news is delivered and how, through them, we define our objective reality.

I will conclude with a quote from an unlikely source — Donald Rumsfeld. Yes, none other than the American secretary of defense.

At an angry Senate subcommittee hearing in May, 2004, following the release of those photos of grinning American soldiers humiliating their Iraqi prisoners — photos that inspired moral outrage all over the world — Rumsfeld testified, unwittingly attesting to the power of the craft of photography: “It is the photographs that give one the vivid realization of what actually took place. Words don’t do it. ….You see the photographs and you get a sense of it, and you cannot help but be outraged.”

At that Netzarine Junction, almost exactly five years ago, the camera did not blink. It did not lie. It recorded reality in a visual way that will be etched in our consciousness for generations to come.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————-

http://www.intifada.com/s2.html 

Jamal is an ordinary worker living in
Gaza. 

He had nine children – until September 30th, 2000.

That day, Jamal went out with his son Mohammed to buy a car. On their way, and without any warning, The Israeli occupation army post started firing in their direction. 

Jamal clutched his son and took cover behind a large cement block. When the firing ceased, Jamal waved his arms to point out to the soldiers that he was unarmed. He pointed to the terrified child holding him. 

The firing continued. Every time Jamal attempted to move, a hail of bullets came flying around him. 

Meanwhile, a French TV crew was filming what was happening. Then, two Palestinian paramedics attempted to snatch the father and son. They were shot.

Palestinian paramedic Bassam al-Balbissi died on the spot, the other paramedic was injured seriously. If there was any hope of escape in Jamal’s mind, it no longer existed. He tried to hide his son behind him, he held him close to him while Mohammed was crying and clutching his tormented father’s T-shirt. 

After an hour of their ordeal, Mohammed was finally hit by several bullets and died

He was 12 years old.

He laid facing the earth, while his father Jamal was leaning on the wall as bullets continued to rain down on him.

His father survived. He is paralysed.

*The Guardian reports the Israeli “investigation” into the killing of the child.

14 Komentar »

  1. Assalamu’alaikum

    mungkin posting-an ini dah lama tapi gak da salahnya kasih komen, soalnya gak sengaja search di google ktm postingan ini. cuman mau kasih do’a buat al-Durra semoga dibahagiakan oleh Allah SWT dan juga semoga ayahnya dapat sembuh dari lumpuhnya, amin. Untuk Israel yang menyebabkan semua itu, terkutuklah kalian dan tunggulah laknat dan Azab Allah melalui tangan-tangan kami para Mujahid Allah. Kemilah Jundullah yang akan menghancurkan kampung-kampung kalian sebagaimana sekarang kampung kalian mendapat teror dari kami. Allahuakbar! Allahuakbar! Allahuakbar!

    Komentar oleh Suryadi Najmuddin — September 30, 2007 @ 3:18 am

  2. It is unforgettable.

    Komentar oleh Khalid Parvez — November 8, 2007 @ 12:30 am

  3. Trouble is, the film is faked; the killing never took place–try to find a spot of blood on either the “wounded” father or the “dead” son. The raw footage that has emerged in the Karsenty libel case shows people running all around both “victims”, who are the only ones under cover (at least from supposed Israeli fire). So why didn’t this loving “father” simply grab his kid and get the hell out of there? Analysis of the bullet holes that appear in the wall from time to time show that the shots must have come in perpendicularly, meaning from one of the Palestinian gun positions, but not from the Israeli. Finally, a minute or two after the “father” cries out that his kid is dead, the kid is plainly seen to move on his own volition.

    We’ve grown all too familiar with this kind of phoney incident. There is, for instance, the filmed “funeral” of one of the “victims” of the alleged Jenin massacre. The trouble is that some non-Arab cameramen followed the funeral procession after it left town. We clearly see the coffin open and the “victim” jump out, thereafter going his merry way–another staged incident for the benefit of gullible westerners.

    Komentar oleh Norman Levitt — November 15, 2007 @ 3:58 pm

  4. A Paliwood Production

    Komentar oleh d sinclair — Desember 30, 2007 @ 9:51 pm

  5. regardless party who pulls the trigger, the boy is dead. blaming other sides on this conflict will only leads to nowhere..
    and yes, fuck zionism… (and salute also for peace movement on israel)

    Komentar oleh aip — Februari 8, 2008 @ 4:37 pm

  6. LISTEN HUMANS…. love each other, don’t hate

    Komentar oleh Azhar Iqbal — September 10, 2008 @ 11:57 am

  7. Assalamu’alaikum..ijin share ya…

    Komentar oleh agung kurniawan — Juli 25, 2010 @ 2:22 pm

  8. What’s up i am kavin, its my first time to commenting anyplace, when i read this article i thought i could also create comment due to this brilliant paragraph.

    Komentar oleh Body Lotion Reviews — Juli 21, 2012 @ 8:07 am

  9. Hi there all, here every person is sharing such
    knowledge, thus it’s pleasant to read this web site, and I used to visit this weblog daily.

    Komentar oleh Kristopher — November 23, 2012 @ 9:47 am

  10. I read this piece of writing fully concerning
    the difference of most up-to-date and preceding technologies, it’s awesome article.

    Komentar oleh soltera — Desember 22, 2012 @ 5:01 pm

  11. Gday! I hope you don’t mind but I decided to post your blog: https://fisan.wordpress.com/2007/03/18/remembering-muhammad-al-durra/ to my online directory website. I used, “Remembering Muhammad al-Durra Try to find the Light” as your weblog title. I hope this is alright with you. In case you’d like me to change the
    title or perhaps remove it entirely, e-mail me at jamaal-fleck@yahoo.
    de. Thank you so much.

    Komentar oleh Payday — Januari 3, 2013 @ 2:37 pm

  12. Thank you for utilizing some time in order to post “Remembering Muhammad al-Durra Try to find the Light”.
    Thanks for a second time ,Geneva

    Komentar oleh http://google.com — Februari 13, 2013 @ 1:07 pm

  13. You check.When you correct the puppy for biting down hard, then the kind of must promptly
    offer him you all over again. It is, again, entirely your responsibility and also your speech model.

    on an the same stage for all.

    Komentar oleh tv trade in — September 26, 2013 @ 9:50 am

  14. most liked and perfect muscular mass putting together routines.

    Course particulars can easily be posted. The German Olympic crew
    2004 bundled accurately everytime 453 sportsmen, 17 over summer 2010’s group.

    Komentar oleh female orgasm secrets revealed system — April 13, 2014 @ 7:50 pm


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Tinggalkan Balasan

Isikan data di bawah atau klik salah satu ikon untuk log in:

Logo WordPress.com

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Logout / Ubah )

Gambar Twitter

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Logout / Ubah )

Foto Facebook

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Logout / Ubah )

Foto Google+

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Logout / Ubah )

Connecting to %s

Buat situs web atau blog gratis di WordPress.com.

%d blogger menyukai ini: